View Single Post
Old 07-31-2003, 11:43 AM   #52
CommishJoe
Global Moderator
 
CommishJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally posted by draven085
Sorry Joe, I read what you posted. I was simply quoting you as an example of a Yankee defender If the Red Sox were to win it all (highly unlikely), it would be pretty foolish to say they bought the title when the Yankees payroll was astronomically larger.
However, they did it in a fashion that denotes buying a lot more then the Yankees did in 96, 98, 99 and 00. So, the only difference is the Yankees spent a ton more this season then the Sox did, so that doesn't mean this team isn't "bought"? I don't quite understand that logic.

And yeah, I'm a Yankee defender. I just like to think I do it logically It just rubs me wrong to think that people try to belittle what the Yankees did in the late 90s by saying it was nothing more then money. It wasn't .. not even by a long shot. I still say the 2002 Angels remind me a LOT of the 1996 Yanks. No all-stars. Just a group of guys playing very well together.
__________________
Joe

Success isn’t owned. It’s leased. And rent is due every day.
CommishJoe is offline   Reply With Quote