|
Those are valid points, Charlie. We'll have to dig deeper into that, but I wouldn't be shocked if interest in 19th century baseball is still a small % of those who like to play historical.
However, if most people don't play historical, according to our data, what's holding them back? I seriously doubt it's the way 19th century baseball functions -- And if that's the case, then what other element of historical play is lacking for them?
Or are they truly uninterested in it?
|