View Single Post
Old 01-07-2015, 04:08 PM   #9
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Arnold View Post
I can say this is not on tap for 16, but certainly something to consider for later releases. We'd have to be sure that doing this wouldn't suddenly make everyone into a Zobrist type player, but it would be nice to have a guy like Hanley Ramirez make a transition to thy outfield, or Mauer to 1B, without them being worse than dreadful at the new position.
Zobrist types (not as good defensively) exist and there are way too many already. The AI forces bats, often power bats into inappropriate defensive positions such as 2B. This causes a cascade throughout a league where good defensive 2B cannot compete for that position because they are up against big bat OF 3B and less often 1B with power who have marginal 2B skills. When these bats reach the threshold to play 2B you end up with 20-30 of the 40 or more MLB 2B being bad fielders. The few successful "true" 2B tend to be unusually good hitters for 2B as that is the only way they can compete. The poor defensive 2B get platooned often, so you will find two players splitting 2B and playing OF (LF RF) or 2B and 3B or 1B plus OF. The moved 2B is sometimes replaced by the SS or 3B or OF partner in this bizarre dance. Infield GP and GS are a mess.

This is completely unrealistic as most real life 2B play only 2B. In 2014 MLB the top 30 2B started 70% of all games at 2B. If you consider a backup then the top 60 2B started 87% of all games at 2B. That is not a lot of sharing. SS is even more exclusive; top 30 76% of all starts top 60 95% of all starts.

2014 Major League Baseball SecondBase | Baseball-Reference.com
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote