hard vs. soft contact (revisiting FIP)
This is quoted from an article about how Sandy Alderson (Mets' GM) decided to keep Lucas Duda and trade Ike Davis last season. url is:
Not all contact is created equal - Fake Teams
PITCHING AND QUALITY OF CONTACT
If hitting the ball hard is a good thing for hitters, it makes sense that giving up hard contact is a bad thing for pitchers.
That is why I think the theory that pitchers have little control over balls in play is very off base. Inside Edge has published data that supports the idea that pitchers do indeed have some control over the results on balls in play:
Batting average by batted ball type:
Hard: around .700
Medium: around .400
Soft: around .140-.150
% of _ that are hard hit:
Home runs: about 100%
Triples: over 80%
Doubles: over 70%
Singles: about 30%
Outs: about 7%
According to that data, pitchers who give up a greater degree of softer contact will have better results than pitchers who give up a greater degree of harder contact. That is why it is important to consider quality of contact when using FIP and xFIP.
Pitchers can control the quality of contact against them by throwing pitches with a lot of movement, by locating their pitches well, and by remaining unpredictable. Conversely, pitchers who throw flat pitches, locate their pitches poorly and remain predictable will give up a larger amount of harder contact.
The fantasy baseball writing team here at Fake Teams is currently working on bringing more access to hidden statistics such as hard hit rate. This is very exciting to me. Hopefully for the 2015 season we’ll be able to give our readers stronger access to this stat, because I think it will change the way we evaluate players in fantasy baseball.