Quote:
Originally Posted by DustinthePOWERHOUSE
That doesn't look bad to me actually, I mean maybe that's the historical evaluation of the players potential, but it's not entirely unreasonable for Catchers to be valued higher than other positional players.
I've had years where certain positions dominate, and years where they don't. I'm not sure that's a bug so much as a progression/regression development.
|
I created a new historical league in OOTP 15. As you can see it looks alot like the OOTP 14 list i posted above (minus the players i imported from the 1990 and 1991 debut years), it also looks like you expect the list to look rating wise. It isn't dominated by catchers like the ootp 15 list from my converted file.
If the list looks doesn't look like the source and doesn't look like a newly created file (made in OOTP 15), and doesn't make sense rating wise, something is wrong.
I haven't progressed time in this league. Its March 4th on the OOTP 14 file, and OOTP 15 file. If i didn't have the steam version, i would go back to the version the guy above mentioned and check that way as well.