OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

sharpmath · 07-15-2003, 02:01 PM

Ok. I have yet another question regarding it.

I had noticed that in the utility, it showed that Walter Johnson had given up 300+ Earned Runs for a 9+ ERA in 1907.

Later, I realized that it wasn't only him, but just about one pitcher on every team who's ERA's were pushed up to the 7-9 mark because of 200-300 extra runs added to their ER totals.

Has anyone had this problem before?
I went to pitch_career.csv to try and fix it, but it shows PROPERLY (at least for Burchell, I Johnson's 1907 wasn't even listed?) but it doesn't show up right on the webpage.

Is there anyway to fix this? Will MS Access help?

I have all the files from every year of the league, so I can use OOPT History from 1901 all over again, but I really, really don't want to. I also don't want the best pitcher on every team to have a 9.00 ERA in 1907 as well.

Anyways. Thanks.

07-15-2003, 02:01 PM	#1
sharpmath Minors (Single A) Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary, AB Posts: 69	OOTP History Utility Question. Ok. I have yet another question regarding it. I had noticed that in the utility, it showed that Walter Johnson had given up 300+ Earned Runs for a 9+ ERA in 1907. Later, I realized that it wasn't only him, but just about one pitcher on every team who's ERA's were pushed up to the 7-9 mark because of 200-300 extra runs added to their ER totals. Has anyone had this problem before? I went to pitch_career.csv to try and fix it, but it shows PROPERLY (at least for Burchell, I Johnson's 1907 wasn't even listed?) but it doesn't show up right on the webpage. Is there anyway to fix this? Will MS Access help? I have all the files from every year of the league, so I can use OOPT History from 1901 all over again, but I really, really don't want to. I also don't want the best pitcher on every team to have a 9.00 ERA in 1907 as well. Anyways. Thanks. __________________ this night has opened my eyes and I will never be the same. I'm not happy and I'm not sad.