Quote:
Originally Posted by lukasberger
I think one big problem is the overall ratings. They are in fact very generic and of limited use, since nearly everyone, even very nice valuable players, gets tagged with a 1* ratings or 20 of 80. So to me, maybe the best solution would be to expand the overall ratings to 10* or to change the 20-80 scale so that more guys get tagged with slightly higher ratings. Then a lot of guys who are now stuck at 20 might have 22-30 overall ratings f.e.
|
Expanding the overall ratings might help, because a 10* system would effectively give us 20 different ratings when you consider the half-star ratings, as well. I personally would not use a 20-80 scale for overall ratings that goes in increments of one because I'm a slave to the 20-80 scouting scale that I learned about when I first picked up Baseball America 20 or so years ago. But more variance in overall ratings would certainly help.