|
Echoing the earlier comment, I like the week to week setup.
If I could make a request/suggestion though, I'd include the standings a little more often. Perhaps at the quarter marks: 4, 8 and 12, with more standings in 14, 15 (focused on the playoff teams) and 16
How do you feel the 'players' adapted to the short schedule? Were 17 man rosters sufficient?
Finances...hm. I'll be very interested in hearing how that plays out. I'm worried the game will be expecting 70-80 home games when it prepares its budget and so every team winds up in the red.
|