Why do some players overall ratings not change, even when their stats are maxed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accipiter
yeah, I went in to the editor and edited LH/RH control/movement ratings...
and whoops! I had 'overall ratings based on AI evaluation, not pure ratings" I thought I had unchecked that when I started the league.
I'm assuming most of you guys/gals uncheck the box and then evaluate players yourselves?
Odd, the guy in the picture at the start is now rated a 71 once I unchecked that box. But if you look at his stats through the minors they were actually pretty good...wonder why the AI evaluation looked at them as such a huge negative?
edit: That actually solves so many mysteries for me. I had Clayton Kershaw on my team and his individual ratings kept plummetting as he hit his late 30s, but his overall kept right up around the mid 70s haha. Oh man
|
Minor league stats aren't weighted as much as major league stats.
A .300 in AAA will be different from .300 in MLB.
In your player's case, he only played 2 games in AAA and depending how the default AI evaluation was set up, his evaluation were most likely coming from his AA (and below) stats which are even less valued. A 3.38 ERA in AA may be equivalent to a 5.00 ERA in MLB in the OOTP world.