View Single Post
Old 10-23-2013, 07:54 PM   #78
dave1927p
FHM Moderator
 
dave1927p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brantford, ON
Posts: 2,906
Quote:
Originally Posted by PromisedPain View Post
I've also been thinking about this. I think it should be easily doable, it shouldn't be that hard to code if you use the player position to judge whetever the player is D or F. As Ciccarelli already mentioned in this topic, I was too quick to judge the player development, as it seems that you get a lot more quality players when you get to year 2030 and so on. I think the aging for the current players should be increased, so some of them could play for longer, so we could've more quality guys between 2014 and 2030.

And with Jeff looking into if there is something stopping the players from not getting 20+ in a certain ratings, I've a lot of faith in this game. Add face gen and reduce the lag in later years, we're going to have an awesome game already.
Development is something that not everyone can agree on. I will always love more customization features to help me shape my world the way I want In ootp I always crank the aging to make careers much shorter just because I find it fun for a change. Times were tough in my 1940-1980's baseball world.

I would really love that ability to mix the modern day and fictional mode so I can evolve the modern day the way I see fit. But I digress...as always.
__________________
IN 1964 THE LEAFS WON THE STANLEY CUP :: IT'S ALSO THE YEAR THE CANADIAN FLAG WAS DESIGNED...coincidence?
dave1927p is offline   Reply With Quote