View Single Post
Old 10-23-2013, 06:28 PM   #14
zoomzilla
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 170
Snepp's calculations definitely had a positive effect. Things are normalizing. No one hit .400 but it was too close for my liking. Top 3 were all in the .390's. I think .400 should be the benchmark, but I'm not opposed to deadball batting average leaders in the .370's Leading RBI was in the 130's.
Pitcher ERA's are coming up, which is good to see because I turned the pitchers stamina up to near deadball levels and starting rotations are 4. Rosters only carry 4 relievers as well. This should mean pitchers era's are generally up because even pitching more innings per game the runs are modern day level, meaning an ERA of 4.00 should be pretty good, sometimes really good. Runs per game was 5.3, about what I'd like to see- give or take 10%.
Batter WAR is off the charts though. Top three were 19.8, 14.4 and 10.5. Steals need to come up but that's not hard. I wonder if it will contribute to overall runs per game. percentage is around 64%. I should also mention this is a 154 game schedule. Modifiers have been lowered slightly to reflect this.

Last edited by zoomzilla; 10-23-2013 at 06:33 PM. Reason: new info
zoomzilla is offline   Reply With Quote