Quote:
Originally Posted by injury log
The game's attitude to ratings scales was something that preoccupied me a bit early in beta this year. I started a thread about it in beta, and I've just bumped that, so it should be at the top of the pile there if you're interested in reading it.
I don't think there really is a coherent design approach to ratings - or at least, there isn't any longer. It's possible there was ages ago, but the entire pitching models and fielding models have since been changed, as have the maps between ratings and performance. There didn't seem much interest on beta in discussing that issue, but I think the game would be a lot more intuitive if it was easier to understand, at a glance, what a '60/100' rating means. It probably should mean 'above average', but in many cases it doesn't.
And... get well soon buddy!  |
Thanks, my friend. Just a cold, no big deal.
I saw the thread in beta, looks really interesting to me at least, dunno how I missed it. I'll look it over asap, and I'm guessing we'll have lots to discuss once I do.