Quote:
Originally Posted by VanillaGorilla
When the heck did I mention Palmeiro? I will present my own opinions. You don't have to assign them to me.
To get the projection for one vs 2, simply take the ratio of IP and multiply/divide into the number you want to project.
In my opinion, 100 games is more meaningful than 27. It is also an adequate number to warrant GG consideration.
Using your method, Ripken wins a CF GG over Edmonds.
|
If Ripken played in 157 G and was worthy & Edmonds played in 120 games then yes.
No one has yet to give me a clear reason why the other guys are better.
I'll check other positions and see what else I can find.
For Catchers as I have said that award is solely based on Thrown Out % and a few C's have won that with less then 125 G played.
1B is based on PO, DP and fewest E. Most of the 1B winners have been on teams with stellar SS's
3B same as 2B but my league is a very good 3B league.
SS same as 3B
OFers I go with most A + fewest E. I have one RF in the NL with 7 GG's. Always among the leader in A and fewest E. His range was 9 for most of his career, now down to around 6.
I'll try to post more bubble guys soon and will see who should win the 2015 GG's soon.
__________________
Go today don't wait for tomorrow
It isn't promised, all the time you get borrowed
Don't live your life for other people
Don't bottle your emotions till they crack and fill a couple just sorrows
Take your mind and refocus go get a paper write your goals out
Throw your middle fingers to all your haters
"Stay Strong"
