[Erich Ingram]

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by fluharty:
<strong>hmm... you may be right, in which case I would advocate having a true rating and a scout's interpretation, similar to the way the ratings & potentials are done now. I wonder if this is already the case? I don't think so, but I could be wrong.

As far as developing over time, I would definately like to see this with the leadership rating- 23 year old rookies are not generally leaders...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">There is a true rating and the interpretation already. The actual ratings are never shown, just what the scout thinks and even then it is not exactly right.

That is true they are generally not leaders at 23 but occasionally it happens