Quote:
Originally Posted by giantsfan777
Hey everyone,
During the modern era there have been 14 pitchers who have won 300 games or more (I count Grover Cleveland Alexander 'cause he pitched over half his seasons after 1920). In the present day game, we may not see many, if any, more 300 game winners. So it is quite accurate for the game not to spit too many of these out over a 100 year time frame. Nevertheless, I want to see about the number we've seen in the nearly 100 years of the modern era.
But I can't seem to get the formula right. I've tried tweaking the "strategy" settings, by setting them all to "normal," but that doesn't seem to make much difference in the numbers that I get. I do play with the aging set to .250 for both batters and pitchers, which I feel renders more realistic (or at least more fun) results; and that should produce a lot more 300 gamers. I can't seem to find the right cocktail of tweaks to get me over the threshold of even producing more than two 300 game winners.
So the question is, what am I missing? How can I increase the number of 300 game winners while not skewing the other results horribly?
|
The pitchers don't necessarily have to be better they need to stick around long enough to get wins. I've had decades in my long time fictional with dominant pitchers. See below
__________________
Cheers
RichW
If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
|