View Single Post
Old 07-15-2013, 07:03 PM   #37
dkgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpejkrm View Post
It's $2.5MM in a modern MLB league for a solid reserve. That isn't that much. These teams have loads of money. Giving up a non-top-20 prospect is very realistic. Hell the Nationals just did it and Hairston is hitting WORSE IRL.

I think the real issue is that the AI NEVER wants to take on money in trades. The Tigers, a big market team, won't even do it.
to me this says the problem is that the AI is better than real gms. dont forget he has another 2.5m next year too

hairston right now is a below replacement level player who is 33, cant field and isnt hitting. in a standard ootp game you could find his production as an aaa call up or free agent.

dont get me wrong the trade AI can always be improved and I would like to see prospects offered when you shop around (even though you can get them if you try), but no team wanting scott hairston is far from "silliness". ive definitely managed to dump salary before too, if you are looking for just prospects you might be running into 40-man roster issues for the other team and will have to take someone with a ML contract back.
dkgo is offline   Reply With Quote