View Single Post
Old 05-17-2013, 11:28 AM   #8
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Painmantle View Post
Yeah they also taught us to never make the last out at third when your the winning run but it happens. And I've seen some pick off attempts to 1st with runners on 1st and 2nd, usually by a LHP as he's facing the base.I think one thing that makes that a possibility of success is the surprise element. They expect you to pay more attention to the guy on 2nd so they get a little to comfortable with their lead. And frankly if I'm up 4-1 with the bases loaded or 2-1, 3-1 with men on 1st and 2nd, the guy on first is a pretty important runner and picking him off could very well save the game. But either way I was just wondering why the option doesn't exist. cause we all know this game isn't about what happens in real life , it's about what you want to happen in your fake Baseball world...and damn it I want to throw to 1st with men on 1st and 2nd and I can't!
I can't say I've ever seen it in an MLB game. No way I have a perfect memory but I suspect that it would have stuck with me because of the extreme risk and stupidity. I'd bet that the pitching coach or manager would come out to ask "what the ____ are you doing"?

Edit. The answer is obvious now.

When men are at 1st and 2nd the 1B does not hold the runner at all. Your IF defense would be seriously compromised otherwise. You cannot throw to 1st if the 1B is not there (balk). Are you suggesting that pitchers throw to the 1B playing behind or off to the side? That may be a balk too. I don't think so. It's clear that the play just doesn't happen unless the defensive team is incompetent or crazy.
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit

Last edited by RchW; 05-17-2013 at 11:43 AM.
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote