Quote:
Originally posted by Aadik
there really wasn't that much to it crackpott- while Bordick had more fielding winshares as well (7.56 to 7.07), that translates to 0.1 games. Rodriguez is far more defendable as a GG winner than Tejeda is as MVP.
|
Actually I disagree. Atleast about the part that Tejada should not be MVP (I think it was a previous post of yours). I've already stated that I don't agree with the definition they use to select MVP, BUT based on this definition, Tejada was more deserving that A-Rod.
Put it this way, take A-Rod out of Texas and they're still a last place club. It's a moot point whether they win 50 games or whatever they did last year. Because basically they're still last place. Take Tejada out of Oakland and it's debateable whether they win their division. Seattle had a great year, and perhaps if Tejada wasn't in Oakland's lineup, Anaheim would have finished first and Seattle would have claimed the Wild Card.