View Single Post
Old 03-11-2013, 03:38 PM   #51
hfield007
All Star Starter
 
hfield007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBL-Commish View Post
Ok, sure, I get that, and accept it. But we're still far better off incorporating the data we have and incrementally improving the game, than leaving it the way it is. Right now we know that somewhere between 20-50% of homers were ISTP in the deadball era, with the numbers depending on year and ballpark. We also know that in OOTP as it currently stands the numbers for all eras are something like 0.5%.

At the very least, giving us a park effect to set ISTP HR% is going to enable the game to be vastly more accurate in this area than it is today.
I agree a hundred percent with most everything you say. haha. But using hard numbers on years based off of the information gathered is not something I think should be done because given the limited amount of them I don't think it'd properly reflect the odds of hitting one in a given year.

An incremental approach (like I and you have both mentioned) I think is the only reasonable approach. I just was unsure if you were promoting use of hard data each year based off of possibly inaccurate findings.
hfield007 is offline   Reply With Quote