Quote:
Originally Posted by John J McGraw
That makes sense. But this is really a meaningless detail. Now, I'm not saying make it outlandish. If 1901-1910 averages 28%, don't use 50%. But these stats are totally meaningless except for determining which lines to use in the pbp, right? And since the total sample size is so small, why not just pick a realistic number for each decade? I mean, what's the point of using what might be an exact number and then breaking it down by park? There won't be enough home runs in a year to make that relevant anyway. Why not just make the whole thing easy for Markus to add to the game?
|
What you just said supports exactly what I was asking for. I provided the most factual ITP HR numbers via SABR at the top of page 2. I suggested incremental even decreases between the percentages each season starting from the 35% in 1901.