Quote:
Originally Posted by nebradska
Mogul handles this by not having a cash maximum and the stadium is paid for all in one lump sum. By many accounts, allowing the AI to have a big chunk of cash like that leads to wonky behavior. My idea, inspired by how stadium building has been handled in some online leagues I'm a part of, is to allow the cost of the stadium be arranged like a contract, just like you would make with a player or a coach. Would a similar negotiation screen be possible? Except, of course, you would have to pay the full cost of construction, but you could customize the costs for each year.
|
You may want to check out post #28 in
in this thread as I describe a similar approach to building a new stadium I would advocate. I think it has a good blend of detail with ease-of-use.
I would not advocate any sort of 'negotiation' however; I don't think it's necessary. Having the user pick the particular 'model' of stadium they want from a list based on its criteria and associated cost is sufficient. The user has to balance the advantages in terms of revenue growth a new park should provide against the carrying costs involved with that particular park 'model'.