Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Moyer
Why would the MLBPA have to approve managerial strategy?
|
Going to a shorter rotation instantly makes the value rise for any starting pitcher. They become more important, have to "work" more, etc.. Pitchers are paid for quality innings, starts, wins, etc. and by going to a 4-man rotation, you immediately squeeze out those 5th starters that get paid like #2 or #3 starters. Forcing guys (30+ players) to take a pay cut to reliever pay is not the MLBPA's business. Also, #1 starter making $20mil per year in a 5-man rotation would likely start getting $25-30mil per year as a #1 in a 4-man rotation. So in my opinion, its a lose-lose either way...as a club (owner, gm, etc.) or member of the MLBPA.