|
Not surprised. I noticed this with the Padres when I simmed the 2010 season. Except for Bell, Mujica and Gregerson (plus Latos's potential) none of their pitchers' ratings seemed true to real life, IMO. Garland, Stauffer and Clayton Richard's ratings were not even worthy of AAA!.
I attribute this to the fact that, on paper, the Padres were one of the weakest teams in the N.L. coming into last year, but still, their pitching (and their bullpen, especially) wasn't the problem. That was supposed to be their offense, minus Adrian, of course.
Honestly, I can't think of any way of correcting this, other than improving pitchers' ratings manually, based on stats.
Just my .02
|