Quote:
Originally Posted by Solonor
Having option years just means that the team can freely move them down to the minors without waivers. If the team takes them off the 40-man roster, then they have to put them on irrevocable waivers. So, for whatever reason, those players must have been taken off the 40-man OR there was a bug that was fixed in v11 where you could put a player on revocable waivers then take them off the 40-man roster with no penalty. So, the fix is that you can't just put a guy who's on the 40-man roster on revocable waivers.
|
Thanks. But, I still have a question. Why would anyone in their right mind expose the reinging NL Rookie of the Year to irrevocable waivers? That is just giving him away, isn't it? Why not trade him? Or, better yet, why not start him?