Thread: Poor Vikings.
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2009, 07:13 PM   #127
molarmite
Hall Of Famer
 
molarmite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaxmagicman View Post
But in the end, the Vikings are 10-2 and the Saints are 12-0, so who cares if they almost lost. They won. They have shown that they are the cream of the crop so far.
That's why I don't like records to decide who's cream of the crop. Let me set this straight, I am NOT saying the Vikings are better than the Saints right now.

If the Redskins kicker makes that FG that he probably makes 49/50 times, Saints are 11-1. If Chester Taylor catches the ball instead of letting it go through his hands and having it get picked off, Vikes could be 11-1 too. Or if the Ravens kicker makes that FG he probably does a majority of the time, the Vikes could be 9-3.

So at the extreme, the Saints could be 3 games ahead of the Vikings or they could be tied based off 3 plays in the entire season. That is why you cannot look at records when comparing great teams, you have to look at how they played the games.
__________________
From the wise mind of Davey Eckstein

"Now all you need is a signature. A quote or initial, perhaps."


[
molarmite is offline   Reply With Quote