View Single Post
Old 07-21-2009, 11:10 PM   #3
TGH-Adfabre
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysok View Post
I can't exactly remember which way it does this.

It's one of these 2 though.
That second year would look at your $ for extensions, which is looking at the next seasons contracts compared to your budget this year.

Or it's taking the average per year figure and not allowing you to average more than you have available.


If you have $3 million for free agents and 3 million for extensions the 3 6 3 wouldn't work either way. The 6 in that second year is more than you'd have for extensions, and the average of 4 mil per year would be more than the 3 mil you have to work with.

If you have 3 million for free agents, but 5 million for extensions then it's working off the first option up there. The 6 million you offer in that second year is more than the 5 million you have to work with for next year.

If you have more than 6 million for extensions then it's taking the average per year salary, the 4 million average is more than the 3 you have for free agents.

It seems it should be doing the first option, but can't remember which way it was finally decided to go with.
Thank you very much. I am always impressed with how helpfull people here are.
__________________
You mock me, therefore I am
My wife
TGH-Adfabre is offline   Reply With Quote