|
Under the heading of not a game flaw but a design decision that drives me crazy, the way players overall and potentials are rated. I hate like hell that a player in rookie ball that doesn't have the skills to ever hit double is rated as a 20 overall (20-80 scale) while my usable but not good role / utility / bench player is also rated a 20. I get that the talent in an entire league isn't distributed like a bell curve by why are players that could never be in the big leagues ranked the same as guys who can serve a role?
|