|
Neags, thanks for your contributions. Don't let the amount of feedback be indicative of the number of people actually trying out the program. I'm certain the number of reports are extremely understated.
I've had TeamRater since it first came out, and have toyed with various methods using the data to rightly inspire appropriate narratives of the team's potentials at pre-season and an additional assessment after the all-star break evaluating post-season positions. The only drawback is my own ambition and patience to derive the most from its variant possibilities. You do good work.
On PDT 2.0, the hardest part was finally getting .net framework's 53meg download to complete and install without PC or connection objections. That's very unusual for my system, but eventually it prevailed and it's installed, I've run it, but obviously in the middle of a season - as I understand it - I'll have to wait a bit in order to establish a new baseline for comparison. Like TR, I think this has great possibilities as a tool for enhanced immersion on a variety of levels. Finding the one that suits me is the next task.
Again, thanks for your continued interest in providing new tools for the community. But always remember there'll be no parades. If you don't do this kind of thing almost solely because you enjoy doing it, then don't do it. I'm glad you do though and hope you do for some time to come.
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett
_____________________________________________
|