Quote:
Originally Posted by nymets3000
I rarely see players that are average-above average in leadership. Either they are in the dark red-orange section or light blue. I'm not sure if that rating changes after time, would make sense but I don't think it does. I remember having 10-15 year veterans that were all star players stay at a 4 leadership, while I just bring up a 22 year old middle reliever that has a 19. I would like to see leadership have a stronger correlation with being a good player and age then all randomness. Randomness should play a small part though, because there are good veterans that aren't much of a leader(Carlos Beltran, for instance), while there are young players that are leaders.
|
Thanks. It's good to see somebody support my impression of strong leadership being relatively rare instead of evenly distributed like other personality traits. That's a pretty neat aspect when you think of it.
I'd like to see leaders start as moderately rated for that quality and improve with experience and stardom, though. A 22-year-old middle reliever can be a natural leader, of course, but would not have much impact if he is wet behind the ears and barely holding on to his job.