Quote:
Originally Posted by Lando
I can see that comprehension is not your strong suit.
My argument was that he wasn't great over a long enough period of time to get into the HOF. You asked for a breakdown of Warner's average or worse seasons, I gave it to you, then you whine about "qualitative shenanigans about putting his career path into vague categories", even though you specifically requested said categories. You close with saying that longevity is the only sensible argument, which was ... exactly ... my original point.
Perhaps you should gracefully bow out of this one before you do any more damage.
|
I'd rather make an error in reading comprehension than be completely uncharismatic. Perhaps you're right that it would be less damaging if I simply stopped conversing with you, a tactic that many people surely take if you are this rude in face-to-face discussion.
As for Warner, suffice it to say that I disagree with your breakdown of his "mediocre" years, but I agree that longevity is a tally against him. Next time I'm talking sports I will ensure that I am logging and tagging the posts of anonymous message board users in a more accurate fashion so as not to be accused of having poor reading comprehension skills by anonymous message board users. That always hurts my feelings so much.