View Single Post
Old 07-04-2008, 11:18 PM   #102
Ben E Lou
Front Office Football Central
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Souf Cackilacky
Posts: 1,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doughnuts? View Post
SkyDog-

I know you input the new numbers into an existing league and got an acceptable level of offensive inflation the first few years, but did you use them to start a league? Because I just did and in year 3 and 4 one league has an ERA over 5 and BA .280. Other league is mid 4 ERA. 2 leagues, 8 teams per.
Quote:
Originally Posted by akw4572 View Post
I believe the smaller the number of teams, the greater the chance for variance.
This is true, and there's also elevated offense early on. So basically, you have a double whammy here likely: offense is elevated, and there's a greater potential for variance from the expected norm. For the new QS, I actually simmed 1950-1975 and deleted all of that history because of the elevated offense. Simming those 25 seasons purges the player talent pool and gives a fully drafted-and-developed league. The history that's in the QS starts in 1976, and therefore matches up with the expectations.
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote