|
[quote=mh2365;2465603]Well I also think there should be at least a little bit of an edge for the teams who were orginally members of the league ... keeping two fighters would accomplish that.
I'm not thinking in terms of an edge, but rather some continuity with a few familiar faces. There are, for example, a couple of guys on the Unstable that produced for me from the get-go, as an expansion team that wasn't all that easy. I'm not even thinking about the stud type of guys like Archie Moore. The ininital draft allowed for one 10 or 11 and had a little wiggle room the number of mid ranged guys. I'd be fine with that. As an expansion franchise I was always a bit miffed I could start with a 10 rated guy. Would like a chance to start the new league with a 10 or an 11 on my roster.
One option, if we want to have some continuity might be a comprimise
between removing everyone currently in the league from to maybe submitting a list of 4 to 6 guys to Scott that are currently on our roster
that could be eligible for the draft with the "right" to break a draft selection tie on just two of them. That way present owners would be assured of having a couple of their old favorites around. They could possibly try to draft more than two of these guys but only a couple would be assured. All of the people we declare draft eligble would have to have prime ratings within the opening parameters eg. not higher than 11.
Bear
__________________
Bear's Unstable
UTBA Season Four Gold Conference Central Division Champion
First UTBA expansion franchise to win a conference divisional title
|