View Single Post
Old 12-31-2007, 01:15 PM   #30
ctorg
Global Moderator
 
ctorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 9,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by YankeePride View Post
What? I was never even considering using it to rate a pitching staff. I was just stating that it should be considered when evaluating talent.

I see what skip is saying but I still say that you consider everything if it's given to you.

Why not consider WHIP if it's thrown out there? Even if it may not fit your raw data stats, it's a stat that shows something.
I tend to think of WHIP as a less useful version of Opponents' OBA. WHIP is easier to get from standard stats, and you can get a reasonable estimate of OOBA from it (AB is approximately 2.9 times IP plus hits).
__________________
My music

"When the trees blow back and forth, that's what makes the wind." - Steven Wright

Fjord emena pancreas thorax fornicate marmalade morpheme proteolysis smaxa cabana offal srue vitriol grope hallelujah lentils
ctorg is offline   Reply With Quote