View Single Post
Old 09-19-2007, 09:08 AM   #98
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cork55 View Post
You may have stumbled onto something here RchW. When you had good teams, you said you could not win much, but when you have "slightly less dominant" teams, you are suddenly winning. This holds true to what I have been seeing where the worse teams seem to perform better than the good teams more than they should.

-Cork55
I should have been more specific. Instead of winning 115-122 games we now win 102-105.


Previously I documented that turning morale off resulted in some consecutive WS wins (going 12-1 to 12-4), while with it on I never won two in a row. Since we moved into the later patches I have won two in a row and also lost in the WS (something that never happened earlier). The first round wipe outs you described are gone.

Like I said, there was a pattern. Now it seems to have changed for the better. Some people have correctly pointed out that these results could be biased by small sample sizes. I intend to study this more with multiple solo leagues, but have not yet had the time.

Your observations match mine from several builds ago (which build are you on?). Currently I feel that morale volume is turned down enough to create realistic variations in the playoffs.
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote