OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

Mattymo · 07-20-2007, 10:23 AM

1998, what you say makes sense.

However...I would think that the number of "great" players is not dependent on how many teams/rounds. In my opinion, there should be an increased number of average/poor players. Take MLB's amateur draft, if you set that draft at 100 rounds, there would still be the same amount of great/good/decent prospects. Teams would then start drafting more guys who wouldn't have been picked otherwise.

I don't know if it's possible, but I'd love to see it where, every year there were a certain amount (not percentage) of 5-star, 4-star, 3-star and so on. After that, the game would just create a bunch of 20/20 guys in order to fill out rosters, etc. Obviously that "amount" would vary from year to year, but it wouldn't be based on a percentage of players created.

07-20-2007, 10:23 AM	#3
Mattymo All Star Starter Join Date: May 2002 Location: Colchester, CT Posts: 1,448	1998, what you say makes sense. However...I would think that the number of "great" players is not dependent on how many teams/rounds. In my opinion, there should be an increased number of average/poor players. Take MLB's amateur draft, if you set that draft at 100 rounds, there would still be the same amount of great/good/decent prospects. Teams would then start drafting more guys who wouldn't have been picked otherwise. I don't know if it's possible, but I'd love to see it where, every year there were a certain amount (not percentage) of 5-star, 4-star, 3-star and so on. After that, the game would just create a bunch of 20/20 guys in order to fill out rosters, etc. Obviously that "amount" would vary from year to year, but it wouldn't be based on a percentage of players created.