OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

Curtis · 05-17-2007, 05:37 PM

But, it's not haphazard; it's logical.

There are three ways to organize the list that come immediately to mind — chronological (as Markus has it now), reverse chronological (newest on top to oldest on bottom, which is how I'd do it), and alphabetical, which is apparently how you'd do it. All three methods, and maybe others that didn't occur to me*, are equally valid. Markus chose a different one than we would've.

So you're making a feature request that a user should be able to order the list to suit themselves?

* = Just thought of two more: Most to least recently used, and most to least frequently used.

05-17-2007, 05:37 PM	#10
Curtis Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Watertown, New York Posts: 4,567	But, it's not haphazard; it's logical. There are three ways to organize the list that come immediately to mind — chronological (as Markus has it now), reverse chronological (newest on top to oldest on bottom, which is how I'd do it), and alphabetical, which is apparently how you'd do it. All three methods, and maybe others that didn't occur to me, are equally valid. Markus chose a different one than we would've. So you're making a feature request that a user should be able to order the list to suit themselves? = Just thought of two more: Most to least recently used, and most to least frequently used.