I think you’re operating under some fundamental misunderstandings, not helped one iota by the hordes of ignorant opinions being spouted by people who don’t know even the most basic facts. Case in point you imply the Premiership cocked up, but they had nothing whatsoever to do with it. That is kind of the point of independent arbitration... it is independent
Blame the silk, he had a total free hand. Moreover given there is no precedent or guideline for this case I’d love to know on what you base the assertion that other clubs would have received a different outcome.
Just out of interest what exactly do you think West Ham have done wrong?