Quote:
Originally Posted by kevchod
I'm not sure why people even post this stuff to begin with.
Anyhow...I remember the good ol' days when people just had to make 25 man Major League rosters. Now we're practically down to tee-ball leagues, and people want them accurate. (HEY! The 4th starter on the A-league team is 6'2", not 6'1"!!!) Okay, maybe I exaggerated a bit there...but you all know what I mean.
|
Well, that's what frustrates me - I don't want T-ball rosters, college feeder leagues or foreign winter leagues.
Accurate team names for MLB/AAA/AA/A and accurate 40 man MLB rosters would be plenty to get me going. Who cares about making sure every player in A ball is accurate when 90% of them are never going to see the majors anyway? And every "real" 2007 MLB league will start the inevitable change to fictional with the June draft anyway.
Fortunately the OP greatly exaggerates the effort it takes to create a historical league, so I've got my division-leading 1970 Royals to keep me occupied until the MLB roster set is finally released.
