Quote:
Originally Posted by Neags23
So, in the case of minimum salary described above... should the team only sign guys to minimum salary contracts to do their best to stay under the cap? Even if this means losing a star player? In other words, if there is an absurdly low cap (say... 10 dollars), should every player on the team be signed to a minimum salary deal? Or can the team at that point just act as if there is no cap? Because in this case, they're doing the latter, even though this isn't an absurdly low salary cap like that, (as evidenced by the fact that some of the teams are obeying the cap).
I can certainly see the complications that arise from all of these different situations, though. I'll pour through some transaction logs and see what's going on with all of these teams and report back sometime later.
Thanks for the info!
|
No, they shouldn't be signing anyone--even for minimum salary. They should be stuck promoting players from their own minors. However, that will automatically give those players minimum salary.
__________________
Solonor's Groovy Computer Baseball League - Making baseball a
hobbit since 2003!
"Beings will come, Frodo. The one constant through all the years has been baseball. Middle Earth has rolled by like an army of Mumakil. It has been erased like a slate, rebuilt and erased again. But baseball has marked the time. This field, this game: it's a part of our past, Frodo. It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again. Oh... beings will come Frodo. Beings will most definitely come." -
Gladden Field of Dreams