View Single Post
Old 03-26-2007, 09:12 PM   #12
disposableheros
Hall Of Famer
 
disposableheros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager View Post
I like them alot so far
If you play with a ratings off league, like the one im doing, then having the stats is very very cool.
You sometimes get players with awesome HS/Col stats but actualy suck

If I have one complaint, its that COL players are no more developed than HS players which makes drafting COl players sort of useless since there is a 4 year age gap.

I hope in a patch we can have it tweaked where COL players are more developed and less volitile but have lower celings.
And HS pitchers need to be more injury prone between 18-22 once they are drafted.


In 2008 I hope you can make it where you can assign each HS and COL feeder league division to have its own quality level.

lets say for example you see a HS pitcher with 80 IP and 130 Ks and a 0.50 ERA but he pitched in a very poor quality league
You see another pitcher who pitched 80 IP with 90Ks and a 2.00 ERA but he pitched at one of the best HS conferences in the country

Whom do you draft?
Being able to seat each division to have a quality level of
Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Average
Good
Excellent
Superb

That would be very very cool
If a beta tester reads this...

TT the college development thing for a patch and the division quality level for 2008!
to get a wider level of talent between the HS and COL level, you can use PCMs (or is it MLEs, steve? )
__________________
2 Wild Cards, 11 Division Champs, 4 League Champs, 3 World Champs, and 3 Best GM awards

Baseball Maelstrom - New York Mets - 180-149 .547
Corporate League Baseball - Coke Buzz - 889-649 .578
Western Hemisphere Baseball League - Santiago Saints - 672-793 .459

Record - 2428-2271 .517
disposableheros is offline   Reply With Quote