</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by Badbeat:
<strong>Name one? Jose Lima... LIMA TIME!?
1998 Hou 33 33 3 1 233.1 229 100 96 34 32 169 16 8 0 0 0 3.70
1999 Hou 35 35 3 0 246.1 256 108 98 30 44 187 21 10 0 0 0 3.58
2000 Hou 33 33 0 0 196.1 251 152 145 48 68 124 7 16 0 0 0 6.65
2001 Det 18 18 2 0 112.2 120 66 59 23 22 43 5 10 0 0 0 4.71
2001 Hou 14 9 0 0 53.0 77 48 43 12 16 41 1 2 0 0 0 7.30
2001 -- 32 27 2 0 165.2 197 114 102 35 38 84 6 12 0 0 0 5.54
2002 Det 4 4 0 0 13.1 20 18 18 4 8 5 1 2 0 0 0 12.15
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by danielb:
<strong>Ahh yes! But wouldn't his ratings (if real players had them) have changed to match his inadequate pitching? My pitchers' ratings DID NOT. Let me re-phrase..Name one starting pitcher who went 17-3 3.18 and the next year went 3-15 6.47 over a full season and in the height of his career..EVER..My point is that the cases are so isolated that it would be safe to say that it just doesn't happen that drastically.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"></strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Lima was a fly ball pitcher moving from Astrodome to Enron Field.
