Quote:
Originally Posted by Solonor
The difference, I think, is that you're saying every player on the 40-man roster that is not on the active roster should be forced to should go through waivers every year and lose an option year every year. Am I right?
If so, that sounds awful, and we would choose to turn such options off. However, I can see where it would be a good game option for some people.
|
no, he's not saying
EVERY player on the 40-man thats not going to be on the 25-man after ST has to clear waivers. he's saying every player not on the 40-man thats not going to be on the 25-man after ST,
THAT IS OUT OF OPTIONS, has to clear irrevocable waivers.
and yes, in MLB, those who are on the 40-man at the end of ST, but not on the 25-man,
DO lose an option every year.
it sounds awful to the MLB GMs as well, but thats the way it is
<STYLE type="text/css">.wysiwyg { background-attachment: scroll; background-repeat: repeat; background-position: 0% 0%; background-color: #f5f5ff; background-image: none; color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal } p { margin: 0px; }</STYLE>