OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

HolyCow98 · 08-28-2006, 12:21 PM

Most of the time I agree with game....but it's cool that I don't always.

There was one that sticks in my mind....

Player A played on a team that ran away with the division and won 113 games
.327/.422/.627 he had 42 HR 122 R and 117 RBI with 17 SB.

Player B played on a team that finished a close 2nd place and won a very respectable 99 wins in their division. He had numbers were .286 /.343/.574. He did have 43 HR 104 R and 131 RBI and 0 SB.

Player A was a 2B/SS and Player B was a LF/RF.

To me they are both canidates and both had great seasons on solid contending teams...but I can only think that the game gave the edge to player B due to 1 extra HR and 14 extra RBI's. I personally think that player A performance led to more runs for his team than Player B did.

The game though chose player B.

08-28-2006, 12:21 PM	#18
HolyCow98 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Douglasville, GA Posts: 2,735	Most of the time I agree with game....but it's cool that I don't always. There was one that sticks in my mind.... Player A played on a team that ran away with the division and won 113 games .327/.422/.627 he had 42 HR 122 R and 117 RBI with 17 SB. Player B played on a team that finished a close 2nd place and won a very respectable 99 wins in their division. He had numbers were .286 /.343/.574. He did have 43 HR 104 R and 131 RBI and 0 SB. Player A was a 2B/SS and Player B was a LF/RF. To me they are both canidates and both had great seasons on solid contending teams...but I can only think that the game gave the edge to player B due to 1 extra HR and 14 extra RBI's. I personally think that player A performance led to more runs for his team than Player B did. The game though chose player B. __________________ NPBL Enjoying its 60th season Georgia GM