|
Hamed,
I share your views regarding Boxing vs. UFC. However the article made some good points regarding boxing promoters. There interested in lining their pockets and not thinking long term for the good of the sport. Also many bouts are not competitive, and are used to build up the record of the promoter’s latest ticket seller. Additionally, the UFC doesn’t have these ridiculous junior and super weight divisions.
Having said that, show me UFC fights that match the excitement and all out action of Robinson vs. LaMotta, Marciano vs. Walcott, Leonard vs. Hagler, Hagler vs. Hearns, etc. Great boxing struggles have ebb and flow, keeping you on the edge of your seat the entire fight. In the UFC, the typical match has one combatant gaining the advantage which leads to victory. It lacks give and take; he who strikes first usually wins.
Finally, give the UFC credit for recognizing that there in the entertainment business. They do and excellent job of selling a product, that reflects long term thinking. This includes going after a young fan base. In the meantime boxing is run by the alphabet organizations, who’s only concern is sanctioning fees and multiply champions.
Austin
|