|
I haven't played OOTP enough to develop a pattern yet. I'm still trying to figure out all the necessary stuff to make a league realistic and the strategy to be successful.
I do have a preference for fictional leagues versus real players. It's harder to intially get attached to fictional players and teams, but the reward is that you have no bias (as someone said earlier) about what a player is "supposed" to do. I suppose if you're looking for historical accuracy then you'd play a historical league anyway.
Fictional leagues seem to be the most work, though, because of the set-up, and I've not yet mastered all of the parameters necessary to have a successful fictional league, but I'll get there. I think given the vast number of options in this game, being the GM, Director of Player Development, and field Manager is too much for one person, but it's hard to decide which to play ...
Thus I guess my short answer is I don't know yet!
|