|
I reran another test this afternoon, and I kinda see what Markus means. With aging modifiers set to 0.2 and development modifiers set to 2.0, I saw a very slight shift.
My concern is that there isn't sufficient leway to make careers longer, since the lowest aging can go is 0.001, and even at 0.200, I'm not seeing much of a difference. The career arcs are really appear too sharp with a steep decline at around 30. I'm not sure if that's an aging issue, or an AI judgement... either way it just feels a little harsh.
I can poke around and runs more tests, but given that the file I forwarded has actual MLB data in it, is there any way to recalibrate the career arcs more effeciently on the back end?
|