View Single Post
Old 07-11-2006, 07:04 PM   #302
jbergey22
Hall Of Famer
 
jbergey22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh2365
Beautiful girl, decent actress, nearly single-handedly killed 24 the first two years.




I think you should drop down 1 draft position for every rating better your free agent pick up is. If you pick up a 5 to replace a 4 you drop one spot and so on.

Of course I have complete faith that Sal can handle this but if he can't I could handle the draft spots for him.
I don't really understand the dropping 1 spot in the draft Mike?

1. It doesnt provide any real punishment for picking up a new boxer(In the whole scheme of things I doubt if anyone will give that(losing 1 spot) a second thought IF deciding to pick someone up)

2. It will add more complication to the draft order

3. It's basically an unfair way to reward a team based on luck of the draw. (I pick 11th, and Conn Chris picks 10th. He picks up a free agent boxer so I move up to 10 w/o doing anything, I gain an advantage but spots 12 through 14 don't gain an advantage because it is all based on pick location which is an odd way to add a rule. If you're pick got moved to a sandwich pick(pick after the 1st round is over) or lost 1 2nd round pick, I could understand a little better.

4. In Essence, The Free Agent Pool should be the worst boxers in UTBA. I guess a few times a team might be able to replace a 3 rated boxer with a 4 or 5, BUT still has to be under the point cap in order to do this. We're not having free agency so its not like one team would be losing a great boxer and need compensation.

I like your most of your idea's Mike, I just dont know what this really adds except complication

Last edited by jbergey22; 07-11-2006 at 07:08 PM.
jbergey22 is offline   Reply With Quote