Quote:
Originally posted by Highlifeman21
hank blalock is a MUCH better "prospect" than Brandon Larson, although i'm sure everyone will disagree with me b/c they can't accept the fact that brandon larson is oh, what's the word for it? overrated....
|
Of course he is much better, but you stated out Larson's Major League stats, not his Triple-A stats, or a combination of the both. You can't say one player is terrible because of his major league stats, but a player who was considerably worse is still great. And no, Larson is not overrated. Larson is not expected to be Chipper Jones, Scott Rolen, or Troy Glaus. The reason he SEEMS overrated, is because you dogged him and called him horrible, which he is not. While he is not a blue chip prospect, he is a solid prospect, because he can be a regular in the majors.