|
I agree that Han-Ram is massively overrated. I also happen to think that Blalock is massively overrated, as evidenced by your referring to him as "studly". I'm sure that a number of baseball executives are probably still high on Han-Ram and are willing to pay more than he's actually worth to acquire his services. To continue with your condescending tone, how hard is it to understand that a player's trade value is determined by a lot more than his statistics? In my experience a player's perceived value often has very little to do with his actual value. In the case of prospects it's ultimately impossible to know what their actual value is anyway. All I'm saying is that for what Han-Ram's perceived value is around MLB I think the Sox can do (and already did) a lot better than trading him for a very high-risk Hank Blalock.
|