Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drprestwood
I think the things he said were a problem.
|
Like what? Specifically? The part about no class? Well, his reasoning was wrong but I think Philly's actions over the past few months have proven TO to be exactly right.
Quote:
|
I also think starting a fistfight with Hugh Douglas, who is essentially management, was a bad idea. And all of the other stuff.
|
Learn to read. Douglas started it. What other stuff?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Azamien
Go tell the media that the company you work for has no class. Then refuse to do as your boss instructs to try to rectify the situation. While you're at it, punch someone in middle management a few times.
Think you'll have a job? If you wouldn't, why should TO?
|
Owens did apologize for the comment on the Eagles having no class. I don't see why he should have had to apologize to his teammates when his teammates had nothing to do with the situation. Let's take your (horribly misplaced and not even remotely similar) analogy of a regular workplace: If you have an issue with management, do you have to make things right with those on the same level as you? That doesn't make sense.
Oh, and Owens didn't punch anybody. He also wasn't the one who was overstepping his bounds and questioning the legitimacy of an injury. Hugh Douglas is middle management? Huh? No, sorry. Analogy doesn't apply. Hugh Douglas is a guy who wasn't good enough to make the team. He's also the guy who, before he was cut from the team ripped Owens repeatedly in the media for wanting more money. You know, the thing Douglas left Philly for. More money.